top of page
IMG_6446.jpg

Master's Thesis

Abstract

Findlay, Ohio's nineteenth-century newspapers published crime reports, legislative actions, and opinion pieces about prostitution within the city. Victorian ideology was inherently rigid and imbalanced between men and women, which is why nonconforming sexual activity, specifically sex for sale, represents a rhetorically significant phenomenon. When considering Findlay's historical and contemporary reputation as a politically conservative and traditional family-focused municipality, the newspaper articles show that some residents resisted gendered behavioral standards that city leaders sought to uphold during its most socioeconomically formative years. This thesis critically looks at previously unstudied, male-authored Victorian prostitution-related articles to determine how journalists ideologically situated and represented the female-centric trade within the community. The project also identifies new information that reflects the women's rhetorical presence. This paper argues that, despite the phallocentric nature of the newspaper articles, prostitutes' metaphorical voices can still be "heard" and recognized for their rhetorical contributions, which encourages historical revisioning.

Research Methodology

Rhetorical Analysis

Methods/Lenses:

  • Critical Discourse Analysis

  • Feminist Rhetorical Theory

  • Autoethnography

Public Presentations
  • Hancock Historical Museum, December 2016

  • Findlay Rotary Club, January 2017

  • Hancock Leadership, February 2017

  • Senior Forum, April 2017

  • Symposium for Scholarship and Creativity, University of Findlay, April 2017

  • 21st Century Englishes Conference, Rhetoric Society of the Black Swamp, Bowling Green State University, October 2017

  • Hancock Leadership, February 2018

Featured Facts
  • Newspaper reports analyzed: 20

  • Page total: 126

  • Primary academics cited: Cheryl Glenn, Jessica Enoch, Sara Ahmed, Bob Broad, Karen Foss, Thomas Huckin, Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Cheris Kramarae, Jacqueline Jones Royster, Gesa E. Kirsch, and Ruth Wodak.

  • Primary historians cited: Mark Connelly, Leslie Fishbein, Deborah Gorham, William D. Humphrey, Richard Kluger, Thaddeus Russel, David Spencer, Barbara Welter, and Rebecca Yamin. 

bottom of page